|
**Al Ittihad: N'Golo Kanté's Pass Success Rate Analysis** In recent years, football has become a subject of debate due to the increasing use of analytics and data-driven decision-making in sports. One of the most controversial areas of discussion has been the use of "Pass Success Rate" (PSR) as a metric to evaluate a player's performance. Al Ittihad, a controversial organization that promotes the idea of "big data" and analytics in football, has been criticized for its use of PSR as a tool to analyze players' performances. In this article, we will examine Al Ittihad's analysis of N'Golo Kanté's pass success rate, evaluate his performance, and discuss the implications of using such metrics in sports. --- ### **What is Pass Success Rate (PSR)?** Pass Success Rate is a metric used to measure a football player's ability to create passes in a game. It is calculated by dividing the number of successful passes by the total number of passes attempted, multiplied by 100 to get a percentage. PSR is often used by coaches and analysts to assess a player's passing ability and to identify areas for improvement. N'Golo Kanté is a football permanently named as one of the top goalkeepers in recent years, but his ability to create passes has been a subject of debate. In 2020, Kanté made headlines after his controversial passing attempts, which were criticized for being taken by the wrong people or at the wrong moments. His performances were widely analyzed, and many believed that his inability to create successful passes was a strength rather than a weakness. --- ### **Kane's Pass Success Rate Analysis** Al Ittihad's analysis of Kanté's pass success rate revealed that his PSR was relatively low, indicating that he failed to create many passes. However, the lack of a true long-term impact of his performance on his team's success was often overlooked. Many believed that Kanté's failure to create passes was more about his timing and position in the game rather than his passing ability. For example, in his 2020 season, Kanté attempted 24 passes, but only 10 of them were successful. This resulted in a PSR of 41.67%. However, the fact that he failed to create passes in many of his games was often attributed to his poor timing and positioning, rather than his ability to score. --- ### **Comparing Kanté with Other Players** Kane's analysis was often criticized as being based on a narrow window of data, which limited its accuracy. For example, his PSR was often compared to other players who had similar performance records, but many believed that these players were not truly consistent in their passing ability. In contrast, players like Mbappe and Pogba had much higher PSRs,Premier League Frontline indicating that they were more successful in creating passes. However, their performances were often overshadowed by their ability to score, and their PSRs were not always reliable indicators of their overall success. --- ### **The Ethical Implications of Using PSR** The use of PSR as a metric for evaluating a player's performance raises important ethical questions. For one, PSR can be manipulated to highlight a player's weak areas, even if those areas are not actually his true strengths. For example, a player who attempts many passes but only creates a few could be given a high PSR if they are lucky in some games, even if they are poor in others. Additionally, the lack of a true long-term impact of PSR makes it a flawed tool for assessing a player's overall performance. A player who performs well in short-term games may not be able to score goals in the long run, and PSR alone does not capture that. --- ### **The Power of Critical Thinking** While PSR can be a useful tool for analyzing a player's performance, it should not be used in isolation. Coaches and analysts should always consider other factors, such as goal attempts, interception rates, and defensive pressure, when evaluating a player's overall performance. Moreover, the lack of a true long-term impact of PSR means that it should not be used to identify players who are truly underperforming. Instead, it should be used as a supplement to other metrics that provide a more complete picture of a player's ability. --- ### **Conclusion** Al Ittihad's analysis of N'Golo Kanté's pass success rate revealed that his PSR was relatively low, indicating that he failed to create many passes. However, the lack of a true long-term impact of his performance was often overlooked. While Kanté's failures to create passes were sometimes attributed to timing and positioning, many believed that his ability to score was more important. The use of PSR as a metric has important ethical implications, as it can be manipulated to highlight a player's weak areas. However, critical thinking and the consideration of other factors should be essential when evaluating a player's performance. In conclusion, while PSR can be a useful tool for analyzing a player's performance, it should not be used in isolation. Coaches and analysts should always consider other metrics and factors when evaluating a player's overall ability. |
